Home Products Request a Quote
The Problem
Our Guarantee
Engineering
Upgrade Paths
Savings Estimator
Hidden Cost
Compare Options
Case Study
Contact
Contractually Guaranteed Performance

Engineered.
Guaranteed.

Cooling tower and ACHE fan upgrades engineered per site — save energy or boost airflow, backed by a written guarantee in your contract.

18%+Energy savings
10%+Airflow increase
OEMOn-site support
See Our Guarantee
Scroll

Your Cooling Tower Is Bleeding Your Bottom Line

?%
Hidden Gap

You don't know your actual fan efficiency

Catalog numbers are lab results. Once installed, blade angle, tower geometry, wear, and site conditions push real performance far from the rated duty point — silently wasting power and eroding airflow margin.

Forced Derating

When cooling falls short, production pays the price

Insufficient airflow raises cooling water temperature. In peak summer, plants are forced to derate — cutting output to protect equipment. The revenue lost in days exceeds what energy waste costs in a year.

Excess energy cost per fan per year
$35,000+
Illustrative basis: motor size, operating hours, electricity rate.
Daily production loss during summer derating
$25,000+
Example basis: 5% derate on $500K/day production value.

A Contract Guarantee,
Not a Sales Claim

18%
Minimum Energy Savings

Written into the contract. Verified onsite by our engineers using CTI-standard measurement. No fine print.

Missed Target? Refund Applied.
(18% − Actual%) ÷ 18% × Price = Your Refund
Example: If actual savings = 15%, refund = 16.7% of the contract price.
1
Custom Design
Every blade engineered for your specific tower
2
Install & Measure
Our team installs and runs CTI-standard tests
3
Guarantee or Refund
18%+ savings confirmed — or you get money back
Engineering Approach

How We Close the Performance Gap

01 AERODYNAMIC FIT PER SITE

The profile is designed from the actual operating duty.

Before production, blade chord, twist, and tip profile are engineered from the site's actual operating data, including installed fan data, motor load, fan RPM, circulating water flow, and thermal duty rather than a generic replacement mold.

Installed Fan Data Existing diameter, blade count, and arrangement set the retrofit starting point.
Drive Limit Motor load and fan RPM define the real operating limit.
Thermal Duty Circulating water flow and tower temperatures define the airflow target.
02

Construction Matched to Conditions

Hollow FRP construction is selected around corrosion exposure, temperature range, and expected service life so the designed profile can hold in actual operation.

03

Measured Result, Not Rated Claim

Performance is verified on site with before-and-after measurement, so the contractual guarantee is based on field data rather than catalog numbers.

Your Objective

Two Upgrade Paths, One Guarantee

Select the outcome that best matches the plant constraint.

Energy Priority

Same Airflow,
Lower Fan Power

Use the same cooling result to cut fan energy demand.

For sites where cooling duty is already adequate and utility cost is the main driver.

18%+ contractual energy reduction
Capacity Priority

More Airflow,
Same Fan Power

Use the same fan power limit to recover thermal margin.

For sites where thermal margin is limited and more airflow is needed without increasing fan power.

10%+ contractual airflow increase
Energy Savings

See the Energy You Can Recover

Illustrative estimate based on the contractual 18%+ minimum energy reduction.

Current Annual Energy Cost
$120,960
Projected with KM Retrofit
$99,187
Annual Savings
$21,773
18% reduction guaranteed
kW Reduced
36.0 kW
5-Year Savings
$108,864
Cost Avoided / Day
$62
Project Basis

Cooling Shortfall = Forced Derating

Energy waste is visible on your utility bill. But the bigger loss is invisible: when cooling towers can't reject enough heat, production gets derated.

A 5% forced derating on a $500K/day operation costs $25,000 every day it runs. Over a summer season, that's millions — not thousands.

Our fans deliver 10%+ more airflow at the same fan power. The cooling margin comes back, and so does your full production capacity.

Typical Annual Revenue at Risk
$2.25M
from 5% derating × 90 summer days
Estimate your exposure
Annual Revenue Lost
$2,250,000
Daily Loss
$25,000
Recovered with KM
$2,250,000
Fan ROI
~2 days

Three Ways to Upgrade — Only One Is Guaranteed

Motor Upgrade

$$
moderate investment
~ Moderate efficiency
No performance guarantee
Root cause untouched
~ Medium downtime
3–5 year payback
Best

KM Fan Retrofit

$$
same cost, guaranteed ROI
18%+ energy savings
10%+ airflow, cooling capacity guaranteed
Contractual performance guarantee
Drop-in retrofit, minimal downtime
Fast payback

New Cooling Cell

$$$$$
major capital expenditure
Max capacity gain
No efficiency gain
~ Over-engineered
Major downtime
7–10 year payback

Real Results, Not Promises

2-year-old 7-blade fan replaced with site-engineered 8-blade FRP · 28 ft · VCM Plant, USA · 2025

-24.7%
Energy Reduction
+11.1%
Airflow Increase
Measured
On Site
Verified Result

Before

133.9
kWh
Energy
808.6
m³/s
Airflow
175.7
A
Motor Current
11.59
m/s
Air Velocity

After

100.7
kWh
Energy
898.3
m³/s
Airflow
136.5
A
Motor Current
12.62
m/s
Air Velocity

Measured on-site under operating conditions. Not lab-rated.

Ready to Close the Performance Gap?

Send us your tower specs and operating duty. We'll return an engineered recommendation with projected savings — backed by a contractual guarantee.

Request Engineering Evaluation